Hacker News
The article argues that GitHub's default repository view, a directory dump, is outdated for the AI-accelerated, top-down developer workflow. It proposes prioritizing the README file as the default entry point to provide immediate context and meaning.
AI 生成摘要
文章認為，GitHub 預設顯示的程式碼倉庫目錄結構，已不符合 AI 加速、由上而下開發者的工作流程。作者建議應將 README 文件設為預設入口，以提供即時的上下文和意義。
Sign up
Sign in
Sign up
Sign in
--
Listen
Share
Lately, I’ve been diving into some incredible open-source projects shared on Twitter, but every time I click through to the GitHub repo, I hit the same wall: a directory dump.
Folders. Files. Zero context.
But here’s the thing, every repo already has a one-pager that explains everything. The README. It’s the high-level overview, the architecture sketch, the “why this exists” in plain English. Why isn’t this the first thing we see by default?
In today’s world, developers don’t want to dig through /utils just to figure out what a repo does. We want the big picture and how the idea lands to the end user
The README gives us that. It’s the front door and the elevator pitch. But GitHub still makes us enter through the basement.
Imagine if it were flipped:
Back when repos were tiny and self-contained, the file view made sense. It was built for a world where developers explored bottom‑up: open the repo, scan the folders, dive into the code, figure things out manually. GitHub’s UI was optimized for that workflow, but we now live in a top‑down, meaning‑first, AI‑accelerated world.
AI coding tools have changed how we explore repos. We don’t start by reading files line-by-line anymore. We start by asking:
In this new age, GitHub as well as other version control systems including GitLab/BitBucket etc. should flip the view already
--
--
Building for developers | Georgia Tech
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Rules
Terms
Text to speech