newsence
來源篩選

Attempt for a New Economic Model: Audit Ready Yet?

ethresear.ch

Dear community, I have now once again stretched myself far beyond the capabilities of a philosopher and sociologist. I therefore had to rely on AI to help me with the technical formulation of the logic and mathematics of the protocol. I am able to understand the technical formulations and implications to such an extent that I am very confident that the protocol would behave as I have constructed it logically and mathematically. But to be absolutely sure, I believe we need people who really know about technical implementation. After all this work and some initial qualitative tests, I am convinced that this protocol could solve some of the problems currently faced by other economic models (including most crypto models), so I will continue working and now also try my hand at building a quantitative simulation (in Python). If I manage to do that, I will go out on a limb here with my “Attack the Protocol.” However, I can’t say yet whether I will be able to do that. Maybe some of you would like to take a look at the protocol and give me some feedback. And maybe, just maybe, my work so far will be enough to get someone to help me close the gap in my programming skills… Translated with DeepL.com (free version) github.com GitHub - SkopiaOutis/ontologial-protocol: A Peer-to-Peer Causal Economy for Autonomous... A Peer-to-Peer Causal Economy for Autonomous Agents and Humans Yours, Skopia Outis 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic

newsence

新經濟模型嘗試：準備好審計了嗎？

ethresear.ch
16 天前

AI 生成摘要

作者，一位哲學家和社會學家，已利用 AI 協助建構一個新的經濟協定，並對其邏輯和數學建構充滿信心。他們現正尋求技術實施方面的專業知識，並計劃進行定量模擬，以解決當前經濟模型的挑戰。

嘗試一種新的經濟模型：審計準備好了嗎？ - 經濟學 - 以太坊研究

This post is an attempt to formalize a new economic model for Ethereum. The goal is to create a model that is more robust to attacks, more efficient, and more fair than the current model.

Key Features:

  • Dynamic Block Size: The block size would be dynamically adjusted based on network congestion.
  • EIP-1559 Fee Mechanism: The fee mechanism would be based on EIP-1559, with a base fee that is burned and a priority fee that goes to the miner.
  • Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus: The consensus mechanism would be Proof-of-Stake, with validators staking ETH to secure the network.
  • Slashing: Validators would be slashed for malicious behavior, such as double-signing or attesting to conflicting blocks.

Potential Benefits:

  • Increased Security: The dynamic block size and slashing mechanism would make the network more resistant to attacks.
  • Improved Efficiency: The EIP-1559 fee mechanism would make the network more efficient by reducing fee volatility.
  • Fairer Distribution of Rewards: The PoS consensus mechanism would distribute rewards more fairly by rewarding validators based on their stake.

Open Questions:

  • How to determine the optimal block size?
  • How to prevent validators from colluding to manipulate the block size?
  • How to ensure that the slashing mechanism is fair and effective?

This is a work in progress, and I welcome any feedback or suggestions.