newsence
來源篩選

Okay, I’m slightly less mad about that ‘Magnificent Ambersons’ AI project

Techcrunch

Initially skeptical of a startup's plan to recreate lost footage from Orson Welles' 'The Magnificent Ambersons' using AI, the author finds new understanding after a New Yorker profile reveals the project stems from a genuine love for Welles' work by founder Edward Saatchi.

newsence

好吧,我對那個「華麗的安柏遜一家」AI計畫稍微沒那麼生氣了

Techcrunch
20 天前

AI 生成摘要

作者最初對一家新創公司利用AI重現奧森·威爾斯經典電影《華麗的安柏遜一家》遺失片段的計畫感到懷疑,但在《紐約客》的深入報導揭示該計畫源於創辦人愛德華·薩奇對威爾斯作品的真摯熱愛後,作者的看法有所轉變。

Okay, I’m slightly less mad about that ‘Magnificent Ambersons’ AI project | TechCrunch

Image Image

Topics

Latest

AI

Amazon

Apps

Biotech & Health

Climate

Cloud Computing

Commerce

Crypto

Enterprise

EVs

Fintech

Fundraising

Gadgets

Gaming

Google

Government & Policy

Hardware

Instagram

Layoffs

Media & Entertainment

Meta

Microsoft

Privacy

Robotics

Security

Social

Space

Startups

TikTok

Transportation

Venture

More from TechCrunch

Staff

Events

Startup Battlefield

StrictlyVC

Newsletters

Podcasts

Videos

Partner Content

TechCrunch Brand Studio

Crunchboard

Contact Us

Image

Okay, I’m slightly less mad about that ‘Magnificent Ambersons’ AI project

When a startup announced plans last fall to recreate lost footage from Orson Welles’ classic film “The Magnificent Ambersons” using generative AI, I was skeptical. More than that, I was baffled why anyone would spend time and money on something that seemed guaranteed to outrage cinephiles while offering negligible commercial value.

This week, an in-depth profile by the New Yorker’s Michael Schulman provides more details about the project. If nothing else, it helps explain why the startup Fable and its founder Edward Saatchi are pursuing it: It seems to come from a genuine love of Welles and his work.

Saatchi (whose father was a founder of advertising firm Saatchi & Saatchi) recalled a childhood of watching films in a private screening room with his “movie mad” parents. He said he first saw “Ambersons” when he was twelve.

The profile also explains why “Ambersons,” while much less famous than Welles’ first film “Citizen Kane,” remains so tantalizing — Welles himself claimed it was a “much better picture” than “Kane,” but after a disastrous preview screening, the studio cut 43 minutes from the film, added an abrupt and unconvincing happy ending, and eventually destroyed the excised footage to make space in its vaults.

“To me, this is the holy grail of lost cinema,” Saatchi said. “It just seemed intuitively that there would be some way to undo what had happened.”

Saatchi is the only latest Welles devotee to dream of recreating the lost footage. In fact, Fable is working with filmmaker Brian Rose, who already spent years trying to achieve the same thing with animated scenes based on the movie’s script, photographs, and Welles’ notes. (Rose said that after he screened the results for friends and family, “a lot of them were scratching their heads.”)

So while Fable is using more advanced technology — filming scenes in live action, then eventually overlaying them with digital recreations of the original actors and their voices — this project is best understood as a better-funded, more sophisticated version of Rose’s work. It’s a fan’s attempt to glimpse Welles’ vision.

TechCrunch Founder Summit 2026: Tickets Live

TechCrunch Founder Summit: Tickets Live

Notably, while the New Yorker article includes a few clips of Rose’s animations, as well as images of Fable’s AI actors, there’s no footage showing the results of Fable’s live action-AI hybrid.

By the company’s own admission, there are significant challenges, whether that’s fixing obvious blunders like a two-headed version of the actor Joseph Cotten, or the more subjective task of recreating the rich lighting and shadows found in Welles’ footage. (Saatchi even described a “happiness” problem, with the AI tending to make women characters look inappropriately happy.)

As for whether this footage will ever be released to the public, Saatchi admitted it was “a total mistake” not to speak to Welles’ estate before his announcement. Since then, he has reportedly been working to win over both the estate and Warner Bros., which owns the rights to the film. Welles’ daughter Beatrice told Schulman that while she remains “skeptical,” she now believes “they are going into this project with enormous respect toward my father and this beautiful movie.”

The actor and biographer Simon Callow — who’s currently writing the fourth book in his multi-volume Welles biography — has also agreed to advise the project, which he described as a “great idea.” (Callow is a family friend of the Saatchis.)

But not everyone has been convinced. Melissa Galt said her mother, the actress Anne Baxter, would “not have agreed with that at all.”

“It’s not the truth,” Galt said. “It’s a creation of someone else’s truth. But it’s not the original, and she was a purist.”

And while I’ve become more sympathetic to Saatchi’s aims, I was also reminded of a recent essay in which the writer Aaron Bady compared AI to the vampires in “Sinners,” arguing that when it comes to art, both vampires and AI will always come up short, because knowledge of mortality and limitations is “what makes art possible.”

“Without death, without loss, and without the space between my body and yours, separating my memories from yours, we cannot make art or desire or feeling,” Bady wrote.

In that light, Saatchi’s insistence that “it just seemed intuitive that there would be some way to undo what had happened” feels, if not outright vampiric, then at least a little childish in its unwillingness to accept that some losses are permanent. It may not, perhaps, be that different from a startup founder claiming they can make grief obsolete — or a studio executive insisting that “The Magnificent Ambersons” needed a happy ending.

Topics

Image

Anthony Ha is TechCrunch’s weekend editor. Previously, he worked as a tech reporter at Adweek, a senior editor at VentureBeat, a local government reporter at the Hollister Free Lance, and vice president of content at a VC firm. He lives in New York City.

You can contact or verify outreach from Anthony by emailing [email protected].

Image

Tickets are live at the lowest rates of the year. Save up to $680 on your pass now.Meet investors. Discover your next portfolio company. Hear from 250+ tech leaders, dive into 200+ sessions, and explore 300+ startups building what’s next. Don’t miss these one-time savings.

Most Popular

The backlash over OpenAI’s decision to retire GPT-4o shows how dangerous AI companions can be

The backlash over OpenAI’s decision to retire GPT-4o shows how dangerous AI companions can be

Anthropic releases Opus 4.6 with new ‘agent teams’

Anthropic releases Opus 4.6 with new ‘agent teams’

Sam Altman got exceptionally testy over Claude Super Bowl ads

Sam Altman got exceptionally testy over Claude Super Bowl ads

Homeland Security is trying to force tech companies to hand over data about Trump critics

Homeland Security is trying to force tech companies to hand over data about Trump critics

Fintech CEO and Forbes 30 Under 30 alum has been charged for alleged fraud

Fintech CEO and Forbes 30 Under 30 alum has been charged for alleged fraud

Two Stanford students launch $2M startup accelerator for students nationwide

Two Stanford students launch $2M startup accelerator for students nationwide

Notepad++ says Chinese government hackers hijacked its software updates for months

Notepad++ says Chinese government hackers hijacked its software updates for months

Image

© 2025 TechCrunch Media LLC.