Techcrunch
Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) is advising startup founders to be less fixated on achieving extremely high Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) numbers, particularly in the current AI boom, suggesting that not all growth is equal and some reported figures may be misleading.
AI 生成摘要
風險投資公司 Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) 建議創始人不要過度關注實現極高的年度經常性收入 (ARR) 數字，尤其是在當前的 AI 熱潮中，並指出並非所有增長都相同，有些報告的數字可能具有誤導性。
Latest
AI
Amazon
Apps
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
Crypto
Enterprise
EVs
Fintech
Fundraising
Gadgets
Gaming
Government & Policy
Hardware
Layoffs
Media & Entertainment
Meta
Microsoft
Privacy
Robotics
Security
Social
Space
Startups
TikTok
Transportation
Venture
Staff
Events
Startup Battlefield
StrictlyVC
Newsletters
Podcasts
Videos
Partner Content
TechCrunch Brand Studio
Crunchboard
Contact Us
The AI investing boom (or perhaps bubble) is something Silicon Valley has seen many times before: a gold rush of VC money thrown at the Big New Thing. But one aspect of it is completely unique to these times: startups rocketing from $0 to as much as $100 million in annual recurring revenue, sometimes in a matter of months.
Word on the street is that many a VC won’t even look at a startup that’s not on the ARR superhighway, aiming for $100 million in ARR before their Series A funding round.
But Andreessen Horowitz general partner Jennifer Li, who helps oversee many of the firm’s most important AI companies, warns that some of the ARR mania is based on myths.
“Not all ARR is created equal, and not all growth is equal either,” Li said on an episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast. She said to be especially skeptical of a founder announcing spectacular ARR numbers or growth in a tweet.
Now, there is a legit, well-recognized term in accounting called annual recurring revenue, which refers to the annualized value of contracted, recurring subscription revenue. Essentially, that’s a guaranteed level of revenue because it comes from customers on a contract.
But what many of these founders are tweeting about is really “revenue run rate” — taking whatever money was paid in a period of time and annualizing it. That’s not the same.
“There’s a lot of missing nuances of the business quality, retention, and durability that’s missing in that conversation,” Li warned.
A founder may have just had a killer month of sales, but not every month will necessarily repeat it. Or a startup may have a lot of short-term customers doing pilot programs, so revenue isn’t guaranteed to stick around after the pilot period.
Normally, such boasts about growth via tweets should be treated for what they are: don’t believe everything you read on the internet at face value.
But because fast-growth is a hallmark of AI startups, such claims are “introducing a lot of anxiety” to inexperienced founders who are now asking how they can also instantly go from zero to $100 million, she said.
Li’s answer: “You don’t. Sure, it’s a great aspiration, but you don’t have to build a business that way, to only optimize for the top-line growth.”
She said a better way to think of it is: how to grow sustainably, where once customers sign up, they stick around and expand their spend with your company. This can lead to “growing 5x or 10x year-over-year,” said Li, meaning growth from $1 million to between $5 million and $10 million in the first year, to between $25 million to $50 million in year two, and so on.
Li pointed out is that this is still “unheard of” levels of growth. If it’s coupled with happy customers — aka high retention rates — those startups will find investors willing to back them.
Of course, some of the portfolio companies in Li’s a16z group (the infrastructure team) have hit those kinds of racing ARR numbers: Cursor, ElevenLabs, and Fal.ai. But that growth is tied to “durable businesses,” said Li, adding, “There’s real reasons behind each of them.”
Li also said that kind of growth comes with its own set of operational problems like hiring.
“How do we hire, not fast, but the right people who can really jump into this type of speed and culture,” she said. And the answer is: not easily.
That means those first 100 people wear a lot of hats and missteps are bound to happen. Last year, Cursor, for instance, angered its customer base with a poorly rolled out pricing change.
Li pointed out that other fast-growth startups deal with legal and compliance issues before they have systems in place to, or face new AI-age issues like countering deepfakes.
So while lightning-fast growth can be a good problem to have, it’s also a little bit like: be careful what you wish for.
Listen to the full episode here:
Topics
Venture Editor
Tickets are live at the lowest rates of the year. Save up to $680 on your pass now.Meet investors. Discover your next portfolio company. Hear from 250+ tech leaders, dive into 200+ sessions, and explore 300+ startups building what’s next. Don’t miss these one-time savings.
Homeland Security is trying to force tech companies to hand over data about Trump critics
Fintech CEO and Forbes 30 Under 30 alum has been charged for alleged fraud
Two Stanford students launch $2M startup accelerator for students nationwide
Notepad++ says Chinese government hackers hijacked its software updates for months
Meet the new European unicorns of 2026
Nvidia CEO pushes back against report that his company’s $100B OpenAI investment has stalled
OpenClaw’s AI assistants are now building their own social network
© 2025 TechCrunch Media LLC.